Press releases: spin and propaganda
Press releases are a form of propaganda. Publishing them on your website shows your customers how you are attempting to spin the media.
The Web is where we go because we don’t believe the hype, because we don’t like being spun. The Web is the land of the thinking customer. So, why do so many organizations still publish press releases prominently on their websites?
Have you visited any North Korean websites lately? If you did, you will have come across lots of pictures of heroic leaders, and read glowing eulogies of magnificent achievements. It is easy to laugh at these ham-fisted attempts at propaganda until, that is, you have the need to visit a government website for your own country.
Last year, I lost my passport. I needed to go to the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs website. The first thing I saw was a big picture of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, followed by a slightly smaller picture of the Junior Minister for Foreign Affairs. How North Korean.
The Irish government is not alone in its amateur ham-fisted attempts at using the Web for propaganda and electioneering (even when there is no election). Vanity publishing is alive and well on most of the government websites that I review. (And I have reviewed a lot of government websites in a lot of countries.)
Press releases abound. Were press releases published before the Web? No. They were released to the press in the hope of generating media coverage. A website is a publication. The website editor should review the press release, and if there is something interesting in it, turn it into a well-linked story.
A press release nearly always begins with the name of the organization. Why? Because it needs to exist among many other press releases. Journalists will often look for a specific press release based on the organization name. You should never start a web heading/sentence with the name of your organization. Why? Because they’re at your website. They know who you are.
A press release will always have a couple of contextual paragraphs. Why? To give the busy journalist some context. But if someone comes to your website, the context has already been established, and reading such paragraphs will be a waste of time.
The first sentence of many press releases includes the word “today”. Why? Because press releases are like bread; if not consumed quickly they go stale. How do you think a press release with “today” in its text reads tomorrow, or next week, or next month?
Bismarck said that you should never see how sausages and laws are made. The press release shows customers how the story is being made. It shows how the organization is trying to spin the media. The press release has a behind-the-scenes function. It was never meant to see the light of day.
The Web is not where you announce; it’s where you do. Let’s say you have launched a new program aimed at encouraging more men and women over fifty to get screened for colon cancer. How should you use your website? Make it fast and easy for people to sign up for such screening.
When people arrive at your website, you already have their attention. Let them do what they came to your website to do.

George Thomp;son says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 2:00 amI agree. Press releases amount to an insider’s conversation, serving a particular need (announcing/creating news) for a particular audience (the media. Another way, perhaps, to think about it: press releases are meant to serve the suppliers in the information supply chain — not the customers.
I understand why you wouldn’t want to use an organization’s name in a head/subhead. Not sure I would go out of my way to avoid it in the first sentence, though. Aren’t those useful for SEO?
Michael O'Brien says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 8:10 amInteresting comment - ‘Let them do what they came to your website to do.’ That’s the difficult part, building a site to let the visitor do what they came to do especially when it comes to building a journey through the website where you hope a request for further information or a request for a meeting will arise. You look to your web design partner for guidance but many do not know how to and their websites practice the press release syndrome.
Michael says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 9:25 amGreat stuff - I really liked these comments about press releases, excellent insights. Of course, the chances of most organisations changing their approach is sadly pretty low, but I will be doing what I can from my small corner of my org. Onwards!
Catherine says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 12:26 pmI couldn’t agree more.
Too many web sites and intranets out there have boring media releases and ‘what we do’ text etc
Karen Reshkin says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 2:27 pmI see your point, and I agree that our news releases are given more prominence than I think is useful. (I work at a government agency.) On the other hand, they’re a part of the record of what we do, and as such, they probably need to be online somewhere. I don’t really have a choice.
I’d love to work with my colleagues on building richer content about what the news releases are addressing, but they can’t take the time. They’re too busy doing what they do to stop and talk about it.
Still, thanks for questioning the status quo. We need that.
Jeff Margenau says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 2:28 pmPress releases shouldn’t be published on Web sites!? Quite the contrarian concept you’ve broached. Wouldn’t how an organization uses press releases depend on the organization and it’s goals? Or is this a one size fits all philosophy?
Jim says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 5:02 pmAs the manager of a local government Web site, I have to say I don’t completely agree with this one. If we have an event, a new program starting up, a decision the elected officials made, we can’t rely on the local media to provide coverage. We have to get the message out ourselves, and our Web site is an ideal platform. I agree completely a Web site is a publication. I have often said our Web site is our own newspaper. We publish our stories and if the media carries them too, that’s great. And yes, I would love to follow your suggestion to turn press releases into something better and more suited for the Web, but the reality is that for a resource-strapped local government, getting a decent press release written is about as much as we can expect to accomplish. Bigger and better-funded agencies can do things we can only dream about.
Bob Johnson says:
Added on April 21st, 2008 at 8:34 pmQuick comment on the SEO angle here. More important than the name of the organization is the topic of the press release.
My favorite examples are university press releases that are limited to “nameofuniversity - press release” in the title tag without anything unique to the release itself. And that’s an SEO mistake. People are more likely to search for a particular topic “Professor Marvelous Wins Nobel Prize in Physics” than for all the press releases of a particular organization.
Aron Hausler says:
Added on April 22nd, 2008 at 12:53 amHi Gerry,
good article…and in the main it holds true.
We looked at this and took a slightly different view.
We are a government entity that publishes many media releases. Those releases go direct to media contacts, as well as our website. We find that sometimes the media creatively add ‘value’ (spin) to our releases in ways that might skew the original intention of our releases
By publishing releases along with official responses to media enquiries we can keep the ‘value’ adding honest and provide everyone with an equitable chance to access the original source.
kenobi says:
Added on April 28th, 2008 at 4:44 pmThis sounds like the rant of a customer, not a journalist visiting a website. If there was a better way of presenting this information, it would have been done long ago.
While I agree it’s a nice idea that press releases are published as more natural, flowing articles, not templated press releases, this throws up all kinds of issues with who should read what. You potentially cause confusion for everyday non-journalist users. Which ‘news’ should they read? 1) The news feed in the main site or 2) the news feed in the Press & Media section? If there are two news feeds coming from inside an organisation, then should I be reading the press room’s news items because the information will be more credible because it’s less likely to spin to hyper cynical journalists?
No - there needs to be a template / distinction between general user news and communications aimed at journalists. Press release in general can be improved and are not ideal, but it’s evident who they’re for. Turn press releases into fluffy features or articles and journalists will ignore it completely and call the PR team direct on the phone.
One idea would be simply list bullets of facts and events, then supply the phone number of the best PR contact to follow it up. This is pretty much what journalists do - skim a release for what’s being announced, then calling relevant contacts to get the real story or more detail.
Sadly, fluffy or wordy press releases will continue to exist while journalists copy, paste and tweak press releases when ‘writing’ news.
glen says:
Added on May 7th, 2008 at 7:54 pm“Vanity publishing is alive and well on most of the government websites ”
I needed to look up an old house deed on our county’s website. It’s nice that this is available online (they’re public records, after all) rather than me having to schlep down to the courthouse. What’s the first thing you see when you go to this website? http://web.co.wake.nc.us/rdeeds/
If you click on ‘view a message from the registrar’ (lower right), you get a reinforcement in case you didn’t figure out who the registrar was. Different suit but similar pose. Now, the latter link is fine for a picture but I didn’t expect it on the home page.