Links are New Yorkers (Writing great web links)
A good link has no time for small talk or niceties. It acts like a signpost, like a promise. With a good link, what you see is what you get.
If most of today’s web links were married they’d be heading for divorce. Because they never keep their promises. “Darling, I’ll be home at 10.” But the cad of a link doesn’t come home until 4 in the morning.
The link says, “Launch online application form.” What’s a reasonable expectation? That if you click on the link, an online application form will be launched. So I click. Nothing launches. I just get a page of useless text telling me stuff like: “This is a secure site designed to help customers correctly complete a passport application online.” Well, fancy that.
So I scan the page for a link and I find: “Start application process.” From launch to start, am I moving forward at all? I click on that and arrive at a page whose heading is: “Before you start.” Hello? I already launched, then I started, now this page is telling me that I haven’t even started yet. What’s up?
On another website the link says “Become a member.” I click on it. The next link says, “Join.” I click on it. The next link on the next page again says, “Join”. I click on it. Another page of useless text. But I’m making progress because the current link says: “Join Now!”
This sort of thing happens all the time. Why? Because web teams manage graphics, pages, applications, text, video, animations, portals, personalization, social media, vanity, and internal politics. Most web teams think about tools and things and units of stuff and what they like and their bosses like. They don’t think about the task of the customer. They don’t feel responsible for helping the customer to easily complete a task.
I talked to a web consultant recently who had found that on one website, 50 percent of the contact requests went unanswered. “That’s not my problem,” was the web manager’s reply. “That’s the responsibility of the Help Desk.” Ah, but it is your problem, Mr Website Manager. You put up the link: “Contact Us.” You created the form to allow contact.
If your organization is unwilling to get back to people who contact you, here are some alternative ways you could name your link:
Contact Us (only joking)
Contact us if you can
Just try and contact us
Don’t contact us; we’ll contact you
It’s time to end this Pontius Pilate ‘wash my hands of responsibility’ kind of website non-management. If the website doesn’t help customers to complete tasks, it hurts the reputation of the web team and it hurts the reputation of the organization.
We click on a link because we want to complete a task. Thinking linking is thinking doing. It is thinking about the customers’ journey as they seek to complete a task. It is about making that journey as simple and fast as possible.
Stop thinking in web pages and what the organization has to do. Start thinking in tasks and what the customer has to do. Links are New Yorkers. Straight to the point. No messing around.

Recruitment Manchester says:
Added on October 26th, 2009 at 9:17 amGerry spot on.
I was on a page the other day and believed my computer was playing-up, because the link I was clicking on did nothing. I left the page, I’d had enough. Then, woe and behold up pops, one after the other the page I was requesting five minutes previously.
If websites can get this simple process wrong, then what chances have they of fulfilling the bigger tasks?
Mike Simpson says:
Added on October 26th, 2009 at 12:10 pmAnother clear and salient explanation of what should be (but clearly isn’t) bleeding obvious. I always find it helpful to think of a website as analogous to a building (not least because it helps to stop people thinking of it as analogous to a print brochure). So each page is a room, each link is a door and the wording of the link is analogous to the notice on the door. If you go through a door marked ‘reception’ you expect to find yourself in reception. It’s not rocket science.
Another maxim that I try to impress upon people is: No-one should ever have to click a link in order to find out whether or not they want to click that link.
Dave says:
Added on October 26th, 2009 at 3:40 pmReally good point, but you’ve left out a succinct presentation of what a good link SHOULD be:
1. Descriptive of the destination (not “Read More” or “View All”)
2. Short, but long enough to provide a clear description
3. The same text as the title of the destination (title the destination well too…)
4. Identifiable as a link (not the same color as the body copy without any decoration to show a link - are you listening LA Times?)
Your multi-page journey is a problem, but it’s not the same problem as a poorly-made link.