How to advance your web career
To earn more money and get more respect, you need to become a manager of tasks, not a manager of technology, and certainly not a manager of content.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned over the years is that content gets no respect from senior management. Associating yourself with content is a guaranteed way to ensure your career goes nowhere.
The phrase “content management” is an oxymoron in most organizations. At best, it relates to the process of buying fancy technology that will hopefully ‘manage’ the content automatically.
Look what happened to knowledge management; a cousin of content management. Knowledge management became data management. It was about finding the cheapest way possible to store lots and lots of stuff that just might be of some use at some point in the future.
I heard a great definition of a knowledge manager once:
My mother doesn’t understand what I do.
My boss doesn’t understand what I do.
I don’t understand what I do.
The library might have lots of books on leaders, but leaders rarely start out as librarians. The people who become CEOs are sales people, accountants, and technicians. And what do they all have in common? What they do has a quantifiable, measurable impact on the success of the organization.
If taking a content approach is the wrong way to manage your website, then taking an IT approach is even worse. IT is essential but it is a tool, not a management approach. Managing from an IT perspective encourages lots and lots of projects with lots and lots of features and lots and lots of complexity.
We need a new type of manager. Someone who understands the value of content and IT, but who is relentlessly focused on helping customers quickly complete tasks.
What the task manager does can have a quantifiable impact on the success of the organization. A government task manager can show that they are delivering better services to citizens. An intranet task manager can show that they are making other staff more productive. A university task manager can show that they are bringing more and better qualified students to the university.
I know lots of talented people working away at web content trying to do the best job they can. The problem is that it doesn’t really matter to the organization whether they are doing a good job or not. 500 words of content is not measurable in any quantifiable way that means anything to a senior manager.
However, quality content is crucial to task completion. Without content, there would be no Google. Without content, there would be no Amazon. Without content, there would be no eBay, no Twitter, no Facebook.
So, why don’t ‘they’ (senior management) get it, you ask? How come your intranet is run on a shoestring? How come your public website is still dependent on the hand-me-downs from print? How come there’s not enough resources to remove out-of-date content?
Because talking about content is talking about costs. Talking about customer tasks is talking about value. Identify your customers’ top tasks. Then measure your success based on your customers’ ability to quickly complete these tasks. Becoming a task manager is how you will advance your career.
Luc de Ruijter says:
Added on February 21st, 2012 at 1:08 pmMay I give one reaction in response to the proposed strategy to forward your
web career?
Why is it such a tradition in Communication to change the labels all the
time?
It is a kind of run away strategy from the actual problem. Professionals in
Communication tend to rebrand what they are doing instead of improving and
(especially) changing what they are doing.
Relabeling journalist > public relations manager > communication manager >
webmaster > content manager > web manager > task manager is the traditional
way to ’solve’ communication accountability problems. It is futile too if
the competences behind the labels don’t change. And over the last ten years
they haven’t really changed. Changing labels doesn’t change/improve
competence. They merely add more soap to the professional slope on which the
Communication community has been slipping and sliding for decades…
kind regards
Luc de Ruijter
Change in Communication
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on February 21st, 2012 at 2:14 pmLuc, this is one of the best comments I’ve read in a long time. We have to change the competences and skills for sure. And the attitude. Move to a service model, from telling to listening and responding.
Jason says:
Added on February 21st, 2012 at 3:01 pmYeah I don’t think Gerry was saying just changing the label will help solve the problem - although unfortunately it can help your career.
He’s saying we need to ID the most valuable tasks to the business and measure them and prove the content we create/curate is leading to improvements in those measures. Otherwise, we’re just a 30-40k inputter of text into a costly CMS the company is liking paying for as well.
Tenessa Gemelke says:
Added on February 21st, 2012 at 7:15 pmA lot of what you’re saying is true. Unfortunately, the terms “content” and “content management” have too often become equated with the costs (and headaches) of a CMS. And, no matter how good a job you do within the confines of a CMS, that role often puts you into a professional box–a box with a lid on it. But that’s no reason to back away from content itself.
Right now, the field of content strategy is making the case that content is a valuable business asset. And those same CEOs who glaze over at the mention of content management are taking notice. Why? Because when you build a successful strategy that ties user tasks directly to the business model, you’re no longer wallowing in costs and headaches.
Want to advance your web career? Don’t ditch content itself. Ditch the shackles of the CMS. Your boss needs smart content people to rise up and claim their rightful place at the table.
Carl Noronha says:
Added on February 22nd, 2012 at 6:55 am‘Because talking about content is talking about costs. Talking about customer tasks is talking about value. Identify your customers’ top tasks. Then measure your success based on your customers’ ability to quickly complete these tasks. Becoming a task manager is how you will advance your career.’
This sentence from Gerry’s recent newsletter ‘How to Advance Your Web Career’ was the most valuable piece of insight I have ever gotten in my 12 year web career.
Thank you very much, Gerry.
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on February 22nd, 2012 at 8:09 amYou’re very welcome, Carl
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on February 22nd, 2012 at 8:15 amI think we’re in overall agreement here, Tenessa. But I have to say I’ve been really struggling with this thing called “content strategy”. I can’t get my head around it. I can understand it. And I have tried a lot. I’m going to address it in my next issue.
I think we have to have a strategy for the organization and then we use content, technology, design, social media, whatever, to implement that strategy. Content is absolutely essential to success on the Web, but it is an enabler of other things. It is not important in and of itself. Support content, for example, is only useful when it helps people complete support tasks.
Luc de Ruijter says:
Added on February 22nd, 2012 at 8:59 am@Gerry
I think you say something quite relevant which is often overlooked or put aside by professional content producers: “Content [..] is not important in and of itself. Support content, for example, is only useful when it helps people complete support tasks.” For many mediaprofessionals (creating more) content still IS the(ir) purpose. That’s a reason why the shift you (and I) propose to a more supporting, service driven role as content professional takes so much effort to realize.
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on February 22nd, 2012 at 9:09 amLuc, again, spot on. This is the crucial shift. I once met a content manager who every year went to his boss with a folder of all the things he had published on the website. The bigger the folder the happier he and his boss were. Crazy stuff. We have to measure the outcome, not the input. Would you measure sales reps based on how much they talk? Then why do we measure content people based on how much content they produce?
Mike Simpson says:
Added on February 22nd, 2012 at 10:35 amThis, I fully agree with: “If taking a content approach is the wrong way to manage your website, then taking an IT approach is even worse. IT is essential but it is a tool, not a management approach.”
Lots of people, especially senior people, still view the web as an IT issue and in too many organisations, responsibility for the website sits with the techies in IT. Which is like giving responsibility for editing your brochure to the guy who operates the printing press.
Websites are nothing to do with IT, they are a communications matter. IT is just the ink and the paper and the staples. But time and time again people come to me saying “I’ve been asked to do the department’s new website.” and they have an IT background but zero communication experience. So not only do they know nothing about good online communication but, even worse, they think they do know. They think (and their boses think) that to communicate online you need to be fluent in HTML. Whereas actually you need to be fluent in communications.
Jason says:
Added on February 24th, 2012 at 9:49 pmWould be interested to hear Gerry’s take on the rages of Content Strategy but as well - Content Marketing.
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on February 24th, 2012 at 10:05 pmWill be covering content strategy next issue, Jason.
Ryan Hardy says:
Added on April 9th, 2012 at 10:45 amWhen we speak about any strategy we always forget about tactics and in this situation ‘content tactics’ should be developed and implemented. May be these two terms sound similar, but they are different. So, content is a king for any merchant activity in the web sphere, but it really helps to advance web career and it’s a corner stone of marketing nowadays.