Is Google losing the plot?

Goggle has achieved its position by delivering great quality search results really quickly through a very simple interface.

I was at dinner with some friends when one of them said:
“Did you see the Google homepage today? They’ve put a background image on it!” Everyone looked on in disbelief. “Look, I’ll show you,” and he loaded Google on his iPhone. “Oh! It’s not there now.” There was a sigh of relief.

As I walked home I was worried. Google is supposed to test everything, and maybe they were about to introduce a background because they had found that that’s what customers actually wanted. And if that was the case then it would undermine a lot of the ideas I had developed over the years.

I thought these ideas were based on understanding what people actually do on the Web; not what they say they do in focus groups. Not what they think they do. What they actually do.

The core of what I had learned was that people are highly impatient and very, very task-focused. They want clarity, not persuasion. They often respond negatively to old school marketing hero shots and fluffy, warm, meaningless language.

Google is the perfect service for this new customer. We love Google because it is unashamedly a search engine. It has come across as having this relentless focus on helping us find exactly what we need as quickly and easily as possible.

I remember the excitement when Google launched. The other search engines were getting more and more cluttered and filled with graphic ads. Rumors were circulating that these search engines were selling placements in the actual search results.

Google changed all that. It put the customer first, not the advertiser. Even as it rapidly expanded its services it kept its homepage really simple. There must have been intense pressure from these new services to get on the homepage. But most of the time Google resisted.

One of the reasons Google seemingly introduced this new background was because of “Bing envy.” Bing (the Microsoft search engine) has a big colorful background. Well, that’s one of the reasons I don’t use Bing. I need to search. I don’t need distractions. To me, Bing doesn’t come across as serious about search. It feels like a brochure more than a search engine.

There was an immediate backlash on the Web to the Google background. Within no time “remove Google background” became a top 10 search in Google. (Consider how many millions of searches it requires to get into the top 10.)

Twitter went wild with tweets like: “BLOODY GOOGLE! Is there a way to NOT have a blooming background picture?!,” one tweet said. “Glad I’m not the only one who hates the ridiculous Google Background Image. I’m sick of having stuff thrust on me like this,” said another.

Google claimed this was a 24 hour experiment. It stopped it in less than 10 hours and basically apologized. At least Google still listens and responds to its customers. I use Google all the time but the day it stops simplifying my life is the day I’ll move.

 

7 responses


  1. Good post Gerry–however, I think it underestimates the value of experimentation.

    Parroting Bing might have been a bad choice. And this may not have been the right area for Google to experiment (as Bing has mostly taken market share from Yahoo and hasn’t yet posed much of a direct threat to Google). But the point at which you stop experimenting is the point at which you open the door wide for stagnation and competitor innovation beyond your current model.

    We should be smiling when companies experiment–the bigger the company the bigger the smile. Clearly the vocal Twitter minority feels differently!


  2. Mike, you make a very good point here. We absolutely do need to constantly experiment, but I think we can experiment in a limited, sampled way, like Amazon does (and Google usually does as well), without shoving something in front of everyone. But you’re totally right; we can’t stagnate.


  3. I’ve been sold on Google for ages, so am not deeply affected by a simple change they might experiment with. The image (if you’re referring to the gold-lit landscape) was just fine with me. I actually focused on it for a couple of seconds before continuing my search, and lost nothing in the process. Google delivered what I needed; the image was just a pleasant surprise.


  4. I had the same conversation in the office that you had Gerry however the question I ended up asking myself was what are Googles motivations for changing the homepage. You can already have a background image on a Google landing page it’s called iGoogle. iGoogle will soon become the default landing page for Google apps users. So was that just a massive advert for Google apps, a hint to non-expert users that they can customise if they want to?


  5. I am a regular Google search user but I did not notice the change. I rarely go to Google’s homepage; I search directly from the browser. The excellent integration with browsers makes Google’s homepage not that important.

    The image is still there - at the bottom left corner of their homepage, there is a link that lets you pick an image. I just don’t see an option to set it to show me a different image every day.

    I like the nice images that Bing uses on their homepage though. I thought I was not using Bing because I didn’t like Bing’s results. I took a look as I was writing this comment, and I see no big difference between Google and Bing results.

    Google is not perfect. It makes me feel manipulated. I live in Bulgaria. Every time I use a service or tool of theirs they think they need to offer me their Bulgarian version.

    Why do I still prefer Google to Bing? Why don’t I switch to Bing?
    1) Habit: I am used to Google.
    2) Experience: Google is good enough and I do not need to look for alternatives.
    3) Trust: I know I can trust Google, and I do not trust Bing - I have not used it enough.
    4) Doubt: Bing is associated with Microsoft - experience has taught me to take everything that comes from Microsoft with a grain of salt.
    5) (maybe) Social pressure: everyone claims Google is the best.

    Gerry, I agree with you. I will move away when I begin to feel that Google is no longer simple and useful enough.


  6. If Google discovers that the background image is something that makes people switch to Bing, then I think it’s okay to add that feature to Google and appeal more to those visitors who want a background. But make sure that’s really why people are going to Bing and don’t force that change on people–especially the loyal following who prefer a search interface without distractions.

    I visit Bing occasionally to view the images they display, but when I want to search I always use Google. The background photo tends to distract me and take me off task.

    But I do applaud Google for having the guts to try out such a huge change to their home page, and applaud them even more for listening to their customers and quickly changing things back.


  7. I agree with Mary - The image was indeed a pleasant surprise for me and didn’t stop me going about my searching business at all - in fact it made me go about it with a smile on my face. I’m a web designer who came from an arts background and I worry all the time about the lack of visual stimulus on websites. I don’t mean that we should be bombarded by misplaced and inappropriate images - but the web can be a beautiful place and we should allow a bit of the beauty to creep into our daily lives now and again.

Leave a Reply