Website design: Impatient versus bored
Customers are much more likely to get impatient with your website than they are to be bored with it.
When was the last time you were bored with a website? Do you get bored with Google? Do you get bored with Amazon? Perhaps the last book you bought from Amazon was boring, but was the Amazon website itself boring to use?
Do you get bored with Facebook or Twitter? You might get bored with your friends but it’s unlikely that you’ve been bored by the websites themselves. When Facebook announced that they were redesigning their website did everyone go: “Great! We’re so bored with the old one!”
Quite the opposite actually. “After a redesign in March, a Facebook poll revealed that 94 percent of users didn’t like the changes,” Caitlin McDevitt wrote for Slate in February 2010. “When Facebook introduced its News Feed in 2006, students organized to protest against it.”
The Facebook changes may have been the right thing to do. In the long-term, people may have found them very useful. However, people liked the old design because they were used to it. They didn’t want change. Often, the organization wants change much more than the customer.
Why do organizations want change? A number of reasons. To make more money. To improve the quality of the service or product. Because a new manager has been appointed and they need to make their mark. Because the marketing department is bored with the old design. Just bored. It’s a few years old and they’re sick of looking at it.
Redesigning is fun. You feel important. Agencies are great at making you feel that way. They show you way cool designs and you can bring all your intellectual and artistic skills to bear as you discuss way deep things like emotional appeal and branding. Be careful.
The best word to describe your customers on your website is “impatient.” The vast majority of them are at your website to get something done as quickly as possible. The only people who are likely to complain about your website design are website designers. Craigslist is constantly being told that its site is boring. “But the people I hear it from,” Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster told Wired in 2009, “are invariably working for firms that want the job of redoing the site.”
This is a really difficult message for marketers and communicators to hear, but we need to hear it and really, really listen. Those of us who think the essence of our jobs is to make our websites exciting don’t have much of a future in the web industry.
I have said it so many times: Offline marketing and communication is about getting attention. Web marketing and communication is about PAYING attention. The difference in the getting attention skill set and the paying attention skill set is the difference between night and day.
You pay attention to why customers have come to your website. You judge success based on whether they have succeeded in quickly completing the tasks they came to complete.
Focus on reducing your customers’ impatience. And remember, you get paid to be bored.

xgipper says:
Added on February 28th, 2010 at 9:21 pmHear hear. You’ve said it before and you’re saying it again: if it ain’t broke, don’t let those pesky marketing/designer types persuade you you need to have your website re-designed (especially by designers who wanted to be TV directors and want you to have a lengthy “Flash intro” - you’ve mentioned those types before!).
By the way, I can’t count the number of design agency websites I’ve had cause to come across that are completely impractival to use - all I wanted to do was contact most of the ones I looked at. Was that easy info to find? (There’s a whole newsletter there, Gerry!).
Mike Simpson says:
Added on March 1st, 2010 at 10:34 amThis is (as ever) so true. Nobody minds a boring website. Boring things are functional things and on the web functionality is everything. Nobody wants websites to be exciting; let’s face it, anybody who goes to the web for excitement is living a very sad, lonely life.
The *content* of a website can be exciting, of course. But the delivery mechanism for that content should be prosaic, staid, even dull. An ‘exciting’ site actually detracts from the potentially exciting content.
All of which is not to say that websites can’t be improved. We all know plenty that are in desperate need of improvement! But unless a site is so egregiously bad that it deserves to be simply reinvented from scratch, then changes should be gradual and incremental. Because it is an absolute truism that nobody likes change, even if it is an improvement.
Dale Hansman says:
Added on March 3rd, 2010 at 6:32 pmGerry, as I just tweeted (@dalehansman), you’re right on the money… again!
I do disagree with one line: “Those of us who think the essence of our jobs is to make our websites exciting don’t have much of a future in the web industry.”
If you work for someone, or have an important (aka profitable) client, who thinks they need an “exciting” website, then your future depends on delivering it to them.
Hopefully you’re able to deliver what the visitor needs within that same site.
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on March 3rd, 2010 at 6:37 pmDale, you make a very valid point there.