Great websites are boring to manage

Great websites help you complete simple, common tasks in a fast, efficient manner. They are boring to design and manage.

Is your website for your web team? Is it for your marketing manager? Is it for your communications manager? Or perhaps your branding manager? Or maybe some senior manager or politician?

Should it really be for those people? Will focusing on their needs genuinely help you achieve your objectives in the long term? Is pleasing the boss or making sure the web team has fun the way to deliver real value?

Some of us are trapped. We have to please the boss because the boss has a huge ego and will never listen to reason, logic or evidence. Some of us are part of web teams that essentially believe the purpose of the website is to help them:

  1. achieve their personal or departmental objectives
  2. express themselves and develop new skills
  3. have fun and do cool things

Many of the things we need to do to create a great website are very, very boring. Like ongoing review. I hate having to review. I hate having to go back over pages on my website and see if they are still accurate and relevant. And I don’t do it nearly as much as I should. But all the evidence I have seen over the years is that customers will ruthlessly dismiss a website on which they come across out-of-date content. (Just like I do when I’m a customer on someone else’s website.)

On intranets, nobody wants to manage the processes of searching for people or content. Making sure on a day-to-day basis that the quality of search is up to a high standard is really boring work. But start talking about personalization and portals and everyone is jumping around wanting to get involved.

It’s natural and perfectly understandable that we all want to do interesting work and avoid boring work. I want to do interesting work as much as anyone. However, doing interesting and challenging work is often what makes problems for websites, making them technically complicated, graphically overwrought and content heavy.

I came across a website recently that was horrendous to navigate. It had frames everywhere and all sorts of other clever navigational devices that left you totally confused. The organization had lots of really talented, young programmers who were very passionate about the Web. Their passion and desire to express themselves had led to a nightmare website.

It’s the same with a lot of content people. Giving a website to a communicator is like giving a pub to an alcoholic. A huge number of graphic designers are still wedded to the print design approaches. They focus much more on making the website look beautiful than work beautifully.

What’s fun, unfortunately, is often frivolous and counter-productive when it comes to web management. It’s hard to do the boring stuff like removing old content and making sure that every page has a unique title tag. Day-to-day web management is about rolling up your sleeves and getting your hands dirty with the nitty gritty stuff. But remember: You get paid to be bored.



Bookmark and Share

 

4 responses


  1. Dear Gerry,

    Another excellent post… thank you so much… so real!

    Best, Roman


  2. Great websites don’t have to be boring to manage.

    At times, web sites are tedious with the nitty, gritty stuff of managing content, but so is panning for gold.

    It’s when we find that shiny nugget mixed amongst the mud and rocks, that satisfaction is realized and all the work pays off.

    Changing an organization’s attitude about websites is tough work. But, when you can give them statistics showing measurable improvement in visitors’ experience and satisfaction, then they start seeing the value in the content being more important than design, flashy features or social media over-hype.

    Web professionals that strive for satisfaction in customer experience are never bored with their jobs because they can see the results of their hard-work. Like any person, having a defined purpose to their work motivates them to enjoy their job.


  3. I think the thing I find ironic about having a good website be boring is that if you do a great job at it and the website starts to get recognition, the people who are going to then try to make it ‘cool’ will be knocking at the door.

    I had previously managed an intranet that had gone from a very utilitarian and useful to overwhelmed by design. In other words, the intranet team slaved to make the knowledge management applications work and organize the content taxonomy, then the team of people who wanted to look ‘edgier’ got their hands on it.


  4. I agree with most of the end points that he’s trying to convey in this article, I think the way he’s doing it, is misguided, oversimplified and heavy-handed. I definitely take issue with the statement “Great websites are boring to design and manage.” I take issue with the slightly slanderous nature with which he has generalized an entire industry. The impression that I get from this article as a designer is bordering on the insulting. He’s basically saying that our jobs as designers are destined to always be mundane and tiresome because we have to cater to a users needs. This doesn’t really make sense to me. Designing an elegant, visually-appealing and user-centric website is a multidisciplinary art form. It takes thought and a lot of talent in the art of subtlety and design. I would hardly characterize this as… boring. It is in fact completely the opposite in my opinion. I get paid to use my entire toolbox of knowledge in design and development to create a brilliantly simple and beautiful user experience, not to be bored. His statement should read “Great websites are challenging to design and simple to manage.” I do agree that there are a lot of terrible designers out there but it’s like any other industry, there are bad apples all around for sure. I just don’t think it’s fair to speak in such absolutes.

Leave a Reply