Traditional writing skills don’t work on Web

Most web content is overwritten; too much content, too much context, not nearly enough focus on the action. Unfortunately, we’re taught to write this way.

How often are you presented with content on the Web that begins something like this: “Exciting, compelling, and effective user experiences result in high levels of customer loyalty, satisfaction, and referral.” On the surface, this seems like an okay sentence. It’s how we’re taught to write: set the scene, establish the context.

However, it’s utterly useless. It’s like saying: “Every business is an end-to-end network of interrelated people and processes. The more seamless and flexible the network, the more successful the business.” Or: “Your people are your most valuable resource. They contribute to the success of your company.” Or: “Even during the best of times, companies are always looking for ways to trim costs, optimize processes, drive efficiencies, and create greater value for their clients.”

The problem with the above sentences, other than the fact that they are utterly useless, is that they are utterly useless. (Not to mention the fact that they are utterly useless.) They don’t tell you anything you don’t already know, and they give you no real sense of what the product or service is actually about.

If someone is at your website they already have the context. They have made a deliberate decision. They are in an active, doing mode. They want to dig deeper, compare, price, to get detail, detail, detail.

Write web content from an elevator pitch perspective. Your customer has walked into the elevator, the doors have closed, they turn to you and say: “Convince me before the next stop to buy your product.” Design your website from the ‘I badly need to go to the toilet’ perspective. Your customer needs to act and act quickly. That’s the Web.

You’re proud of your website but pride comes before the click of the Back button. Anything on your website that puffs your ego, that makes you smile, that you think is really cool-remove immediately. The content that you’re in love with-and so proud of-is nearly always the content that drives your customers away.

There is far too much content written for the English teacher or the English exam you crammed for. You want to impress. You want to show off all the clever things you know. You want a beginning, middle and end. You want to tell them what you’re going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you’ve told them.

A normal person sees a link called “Where’s my refund?” and thinks that if they click on this link they’ll be able to answer that question quickly. But a classically trained English student who wrote the link thinks that when the person clicks on the link they should be given this sentence. “You filed your tax return and you’re expecting a refund. You have just one question and you want the answer now: Where’s my refund?”

 

12 responses


  1. Well said - totally agree.
    It all comes back to:
    Define your target
    Know your target
    Understand their needs
    Address thir needs
    Do it succinctly and compellingly
    Make them an offer or call them to action in some way
    Invite them to interact with you
    Shut up

    Clare


  2. Or, in the words of William Strunk, Jr., “omit needless words”.


  3. The sentence
    “Exciting, compelling, and effective user
    experiences result in high levels of customer loyalty,
    satisfaction, and referral”
    you took as an example was taken from the article “Web experience solutions for foodservice” from the Microsoft Web site. In that article, that sentence does not start the article, but is found later, down in the “business benefits” section. In that context, it does have a place and makes sense. If people have gone that far in the article, it means they want increasing detail. That sentence fits that bill where it is.


  4. In my opinion, every successful web project prioritizes the end-user experience above all else. As such, you must design the website from the end-user’s perspective.

    Therefore, it is important to understand the demographics, psychographics, emotional/practical needs, and expectations of the end-users for which the project is intended (collectively, the “personas”, a more expansive term than “target audiences”). In this way, features and content can be designed that meets the personas’ needs and achieves the project’s strategic objectives.


  5. There’s a bit of irony here in an article discussing communication failures when this article stretches its sentences the width of my browser and the paragraphs’ margins are so close it looks like I’m reading one huge block of text.

    Or in the interest of summary (as the article suggests), if I can’t read it easily, I won’t read it.


  6. I think I agree with everything but the headline. Traditional writing skills DO work on the web. Traditional writing skills are the only writing skills. A lack of writing skills (i.e. ignoring context and overwriting) DOES NOT work on the web or anywhere else.


  7. Good point, Kirk. IMHO it’s not about the writing skills so much as the writing style. Writing for the Web needs to by information rich, and word short.

    But as the “15th Reader” pointed out, different places on the Web call for different styles. It’s about delivering the quality and style of writing that the user is expecting. Give only enough detail for him/her to accomplish the task, or as much detail as necessary to understand a complex concept.

    Gerry, thanks again for your insight.


  8. Excellent; I’ve sent this to all my team.

    And it’s not just about the web; every application we develop, and every user manual or help system we author, should adopt the same principles.

    The bottom line is about ‘the user’ of any ‘interface’ finding the appropriate information for their needs, quickly and easily. You’d think that wouldn’t be too difficult to create and manage…


  9. Excellent article. We even tweeted it. @braintraffic


  10. I’d modify your opening statement to read, “Most CONTENT is overwritten …” Much of the writing found in traditional communication vehicles is just as overwritten.

    There’s too much information and not enough time to absorb it. Cut to the chase. Tell me what I need to know. “Information rich” and “word short” should be the guiding principle pretty much everywhere.


  11. Gerry point about the importance of tight writing is a good one, but the comments to the post are on the mark too. Traditional writing skills work on the Web in the sense that we need to pay attention to the elements of easily readable prose, regardless of the venue. And doing that well is not as easy as some people would like to think. As evidence, look at a lot of writing, on the Web or in business documents.

    One reason is because people are told to “write the way you talk,” and then they look at their writing and judge it based on how they might say it. The truth is if you write the way you talk, you will ramble and you will pay little attention to grammar and punctuation.

    As for style, if it is conversational (to a point), polite, clear, and tightly written, you will be in good shape. That will be true on the Web, and it also will be true in most business documents.


  12. Thanks. Been telling folks, solve the problem. I don’t read advertising. Its all the same bs in a different package. I read what it does, go to the bottom line. If price and my need line up you have a sale. If not…..
    The longer you make it, the less chance I go to the bottom line.
    I sold Kirbys. Everybody else did a 30 minute demo, sprang the price, spent 2 1/2 hours on closing techniques.
    I gave the price at the start, spent 1 1/2 hour on the demo, and closed over 70% by proving they needed it.

2 trackbacks

Leave a Reply