How to market to the information-rich
The Internet thrives in information-rich societies. Traditional communications and marketing thrive in information-poor ones.
The job of marketing and advertising was much easier in the Twentieth Century. It could inform people of genuinely novel things like cars and soap powder, microwaves and computers.
People lived rudimentary lives back then and these new products and services made things easier and more pleasant. People were information poor and the advertisement was often a source of interesting information. The marketer was saying to the consumer: “Did you know …”
But as the century progressed, genuine newness began to fade. People began to know a lot more. For increasing numbers of people, advertising became an irritant that was constantly tugging at the sleeve of their attention.
The Internet succeeds because it helps us make better decisions. We go to the Web to get more details. We go to the Web on a mission. When was the last time you went to Google and said, “I wonder what should I search for today?” You go to the Web wanting to buy a lawnmower. The chances of your attention being caught by some clever ad for a vacation in Greece is very, very small.
This is a real problem for marketers, because marketers have been trained to say, “Hey, look over here. This is really interesting.” Advertising is specifically designed to interrupt something you are doing.
Imagine you are sitting in an airport reading a book as you wait for your flight to be called. A stranger pulls your sleeve and smiles at you. “I’ve just found out about this amazing new product,” he says to you smiling enthusiastically. “And I’d really like to tell you about it.” What would you think of that sort of person?
On the Internet, spam emails and websites tell us they will change our lives. They tell us that they want to give us millions for nothing. All they need is our bank account details. There are obviously enough foolish people out there to make some of these spammers rich, but the Web is not the land of the fool. Quite the opposite.
The Web is the land of the skeptic, the cynic, the impatient, time-starved, information-overloaded consumer who is on a mission. The mission is to solve a problem, answer a question, get a good deal. The Web is the land of the comparison shopper, the person who wants to read reviews to see if the product is actually any good.
Trying to grab the attention and tug the sleeve of this information-rich consumer is much more likely to irritate than to interest them. Presenting them, on your homepage, with the big, smiling face of some actor who has never used your product, is a good way of getting them to sneer at you.
Marketing must change. Marketing used to say: “Don’t go down that road, go down this road. My destination is much more interesting.” On the Web, we choose our destination and will not change it. Marketing must now say: “I can help you get to your destination faster and easier.”

Judy Vorfeld says:
Added on September 21st, 2008 at 4:04 pmPithy article, and right on the mark. We in marketing must change our approach and attitude to help our target market get to its destination faster and easier.
Brian Anderson says:
Added on September 22nd, 2008 at 3:37 amIn general, the days are past when traditional marketing methods will work like they used to. The Internet, with its screen medium, has changed all that with its focus on what the reader-user-customer is looking for: We are in control.
After spending some time online, conventional “Interruption” marketing like commercials on radio, makes people like me turn me turn it off. Why? Because I can find comparable music online with no commercials. I got rid of my TV 3 years ago as well.
With the proliferation of the Internet, awareness of what marketing is has risen. Yet, ignorance of why and how it needs to be different online is widespread; in fact, it is the rule.
I look at websites all day as I am in the business of writing them. What do I see a lot of? Superlatives, the company name getting repeat mention only centimeters away from its initial mention, statements like, “We” are proud to….(huh? I thought your website was for me, the reader. Why would I care what you’re proud of?), and dense paragraphs in a too-small font which satisfies management’s obsession for providing all the news that’s fit to print and that, it is intended, to ensure everyone gets all the facts.
Problem? With people’s attention span and time so limited online, a new type of decision-making process must be exercised: 1) Ascertaining the most important things or tasks readers will want to find or accomplish, and
2) deciding how best to portray or position them. Do that and sites would lose weight, have less on them, but be more efficient.
In doing so, an old marketing paradigm often found in conventional brochures “more is more” is turned on its head. “Less is more” is the new rule, or one of them.
Frances Sibbet says:
Added on September 22nd, 2008 at 8:56 amGerry I agree with you but with one exception. Do any of you have a gmail account for your email? It has targeted advertising relevant to you as it is based on the words in your email texts. Sounds intrusive but it isn’t - in fact quite the opposite. I’m amazed at how relevant the advertising is to me and have often clicked through to the ads.
Julian says:
Added on September 22nd, 2008 at 8:59 amGood article though I disagree a little with the last para. I think it’s more about not trusting the marketer any more (or to put it another way; knowing the marketer is at best stretching the truth, at worst plain lying) but looking to the non biased (or less biased) community for advice.
I think your last para should be more along the lines of ‘don’t take my word for it… read what everyone else is saying’
Lynne Homeyer says:
Added on September 22nd, 2008 at 3:05 pmIt’s so wonderful, just when I’m feeling that I’ve become boring with my “Our website is not a brochure or a bulletin board, it’s a tool” speech, to be able to use Gerry’s column as the hammer instead. Thank you!
Shelby Thayer says:
Added on September 22nd, 2008 at 8:48 pmGreat post. This is very much tied into your previous post about losing control with Web 2.0. Marketing is getting to be more about conversations and customer service.
I do agree with Julian, however, that part of that frustration on the users part is in not trusting the marketer as opposed to (and/or combined with) being annoyed.