The power of averaged intelligence
The Web is showing us that in a great many areas of human endeavor the best intelligence lies in the network as a whole, rather than any one element.
‘The Origin of Wealth’ by Eric D. Beinhocker is full of wisdom. In it, Beinhocker challenges a lot of the principles of traditional economics. Like, for example, that markets are predictable and that there is some sort of perfect equilibrium. (If markets are indeed predictable then most economists should be fired because of their awful predictions.)
Beinhocker believes that we live in a world of unpredictable complexity that is evolutionary in its behavior. However, while you can’t predict the future, you can seek to be more fit and flexible, so as to adapt quickly to what the future throws at you.
There are hardly any companies that achieve excellence over the long-term, according to Beinhocker. In fact, most go extinct. This leads us to a “brutal truth” about companies. “Markets are highly dynamic, but the vast majority of companies are not.”
I recently had the privilege of working with a company called Vanguard. You’ve probably never heard of them. (They never advertise on TV.) They are an investment management company that has well over a trillion dollars under management. (That’s a lot of money.)
My understanding of the Vanguard approach is that investing in individual stocks is like gambling. Instead, you invest in the market as a whole and invest for the long-term. That’s because over the long-term the market tends to rise. Vanguard focuses on keeping costs as low as possible, meaning it has really low fees. You retire richer with Vanguard.
I used to be a big fan of the heroic individual. I used to have contempt for the crowd. But the Web changed all that. As I watched what succeeded and failed on the Web, it struck me that nearly every major website that succeeded had one thing in common.
Google, EBay, Amazon, You Tube, MySpace, Facebook, etc., all leverage the intelligence of the customer. These, and countless other successful websites, have ways to find the average of customer opinion and behavior. They allow us to discover in a systematic way what people like us think about a product, service, or idea.
The network is wise and the more we embrace and understand it, the wiser we become. We may not be able to predict the future but we can become fitter so that no matter the future throws at us, we can adapt.
So, how do we do that? One way is by using the Web to have more friends of friends. It has been proven that if you’re looking for a new job, you are more likely to get that job through a friend of a friend than a friend.
Fitness in a network is about making connections, getting linked. The organizations that are fittest in a network are those that actively link out and let others link in.

Peter says:
Added on April 27th, 2008 at 6:50 pmVery dissapointing piece, and certainly lacking in “intelligence”; some deeply flawed misconceptions about economics, markets and Vanguard…. I am unsubscribing.
bruce says:
Added on April 28th, 2008 at 8:48 am“It has been proven that if you’re looking for a new job, you are more likely to get that job through a friend of a friend than a friend.”
Hi Gerry - it’s also the case that when an argument is being constructed that rests on “proven” research, mit’s more powerful to cite that research with a link.
Could you do so? I don’t disbelieve you, but some of us use your colleagues as ammunition when discussing strategy with bosses etc
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on April 28th, 2008 at 11:47 amBruce,
Sorry, I couldn’t find the reference before I published, but now have. It’s a study called Getting a Job by Mark Granovetter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Granovetter
bruce says:
Added on May 6th, 2008 at 12:30 pmThanks Gerry.
Ephraim Freed says:
Added on May 19th, 2008 at 7:06 pmPeter, can you explain “flawed misconceptions about economics, markets and Vanguard?” What do you see as the proper conceptions that should replace these?
- - -
Markets are predictable in small snapshots, with very simple market relationships. But in the increasingly complex global market where the number of influencing factors is always growing, I would think only smaller, targeted predictions are possible. An impact of globalization is greater interelation and, therefore, greater complexity to causal flows.
What I find most interesting is that although groupthink can be very dangerous in crowds on the street, in many cases on the internet group intelligence is being levereged to accomplish tasks that computers are incapable of.
Captchas, for instance, and Google’s new Image Labeler, are both examples of human perspective, intellect and contextual analysis being levereged to accomplish complex analytical tasks that computers do not have the adaptabilility to handle.