Finding people: top task on the Web
The Web is supposed to replace manual service with self-service, but sometimes our number one task on a website is to find someone to talk to.
Over the years, I have noticed that a key task, particularly on intranets, is to find people. This is somewhat ironic when you consider that the business case of a website is essentially to replace people with content and applications.
The core business case of a website is self-service. Self-service says that it is cheaper to let customers serve themselves than it is to use staff to serve them. Many organizations have thus seen the Web as a great way to reduce costs.
However, self-service is never about completely eliminating staff from a particular task. There will always be some staff input required in order to allow self-service to function properly. For example, even a coke machine at a railway station requires staff to refill the stock, remove the cash, and do regular maintenance.
The question for the manager is: how much staff input is required in order to deliver maximum return? Let’s look at sales in a business to business environment. I know of one organization that started allowing potential customers to easily chat with qualified engineers on the website. Sales quadrupled.
A potential customer may have answered most of their questions on your website, but there might be a key question that remains unanswered. If they can have a quick chat with someone and get that question answered, you might make the sale or deliver the service. Otherwise, in this increasingly impatient world, the customer might pick up the phone, walk into your office or worse, hit the Back button and go to a competitor.
Recently, we did a Customer Carewords project on getting a credit card. The number one task, not surprisingly, was to get a “low rate that stays low.” As part of Customer Carewords, we also have what we call the Customer Centric Index. This tests the key factors that influence the experience a customer has on your website. The number one factor for customers in this particular poll was:
Hard to contact a person
In a perfect world, customers would go to your website and be able to complete their tasks quickly and easily. They would be happy with the convenience and speed of your site and you would be running a very efficient organization.
But it’s not a perfect world. No matter how simple you make the website, there will always be customers who need more help. And maybe it’s okay to lose those customers because the cost of servicing them is greater than the value they deliver.
However, the more complex the tasks on your website, the more likely that some human intervention is required in order to help maximize task completion. If 30 percent of your customers require just a little extra help, wouldn’t that be worth the effort?
Management on the Web is a balancing act between self-service and manual service. Through a process of continuous testing and observation, you must identify the point in completing a task where some human support would benefit the customer and the organization.

Roman says:
Added on March 10th, 2008 at 6:47 amwe experienced the same situation with our web hosting solution. 2 weeks ago, Google has offered a new free service, that can help organization to better help their customer: http://www.google.com/talk/service/badge/New
The new thing, is that the potential customer, do not need to identify himself, before chatting.
We are going to implement this service within few days, we are sure that is a key element, to be more successful. Roman
Jen from Canada says:
Added on March 10th, 2008 at 7:24 pmWhile I think that is so true, I cannot help but reflect back on how many helpdesk could not answer the customer’s question because they themselves are not given the proper information or it has not been dealt with by management. Customer focused means structuring the organization in a way that it can meet customer’s needs. In your sales case, letting customers talk to qualified engineers means that the product is complex. Just having engineers involved means it is complex.
But in order for sales to quadruple, you would need qualified engineers with the right information that can serve the customers.
Your statement is right-on about management’s job to balance self-service with manual service. It is their job to make sure that resources are available to support the product and services that an organization offers. But how many times does a department talk to another department to collaborate on similar services? How many times does a department share with the helpdesk about how the product should work?
The website is becoming the connection piece between the customer and with the different departments within an organization. Cross-functionality/integrated/channels/holistic or whatever you want to call it, the web brings the organization to the user. That is why your website is a reflection of the organization (an earlier article covered by Gerry). If you are siloed and dysfuncational, expect that your users will experience that siloed-ness and dysfunctionality.
I think that this piece is important, but I have continually reflected back to Gerry’s article that talks about the website as a reflection of the organization. This ties it all together for me. If you cannot offer the service/product, then think long and hard whether to proceed or not. Your company’s online reputation is on the line.
Joan in Alaska says:
Added on March 13th, 2008 at 7:58 pmAnother thing that many online vendors don’t seem to think about is that a potential customer often needs more information than an email address or URL in order to obtain products from the vendor. In my company, for example, no purchase can be made until I complete a requisition (I work in the IT department of a medium size telephone company). Our Purchasing and Contracts staff require that I provide not just the vendor’s name, but a mailing address, phone number and fax number (and I mean require–my requisition will get bounced back to me if I don’t provide this). More and more online vendors absolutely refuse to give any sort of identifying information, thinking, apparently, that all transactions can be completed with a credit card, a fill-in form, and an email address if the customer wants to get in touch. I don’t understand this reluctance to have any personal contact with potential customers. I have informed my co-workers more than once, after futile attempts to find identifying vendor information beyond a website URL, that they’ll have to find a different vendor, because the one they found appears to require a cloak of invisibility, and that’s not who we do business with.