Time for content to become more scientific

Senior managers don’t take content seriously because people who write content don’t come across as being serious. If content professionals want more respect, they need to present content as a science, not an art.

I have spent most of my adult life writing content, or else advising people on how best to write and manage it. I have found it very hard to get senior managers to take content seriously.

Most senior managers simply don’t see the value of quality content. Sure, they don’t want their organizations to publish poor quality content. However, they are wary about really investing in content. Where professional writers are employed, it is expected that their salary will be modest. Why?

Part of the reason is that as writers we are often too precious about our trade. We are loath to admit that there are formulas. In fact, to say that writing is formulaic is a criticism, not a complement.

You wouldn’t criticise a headache tablet for being formulaic, would you? Let’s face it, most of us live in formulaic houses, drive formulaic cars, use formulaic computers, eat formulaic food, wear formulaic clothes, listen to formulaic music, watch formulaic movies, and read formulaic newspapers and books.

When a writer says to a manager that there is no right way to write a heading or summary, that doesn’t impress the manager. When a writer says to a manager that you can’t really judge the impact of a particular piece of content, that doesn’t impress the manager.

Managers must manage. To manage, you must be able to measure. That which can’t be measured, can’t be managed. Managers love formulas. They love systematic ways of doing things. Laws and regulations are formulas, and it would be impossible for societies to function without them. So why can’t content have formulas?

Some writers think that if their writing is shown to be formulaic, they will be valued less. Some writers have a fear of the quality of their writing being determined by its impact. Some writers look at writing as an expression of who they are, and that being able to write however they want is some sort of fundamental human right.

I’ve heard vigorous arguments over the years about website classification. I’ve heard people claim that everyone is different, that there is no ‘right’ way to classify something, and that to seek order and hierarchy for a website is somehow undemocratic and contrary to what the founding fathers, mothers and grandchildren would want.

I’m all for formulaic writing. I love hierarchies and classification. I’m all for measuring content. There is a ‘right’ way to write content. Sure, it may not be the ‘perfect’ way, it may not be the way Shakespeare or Joyce would have written it, but it’ll do. It’ll get results and deliver value. A production line can be set up where this content can be mass produced, tested, and measured.

Get that production line going, and I guarantee you, you will get the attention and respect of senior management. You’ll also get paid a lot more.

 

21 responses


  1. Gerry,

    As a creative director who also writes, I agree with your comments 1000%. Many commercial artists and designers also have the prima donna attitude toward their work, rather than seeing it as a means to an end.

    Keep up the helpful articles.

    Jeff


  2. After all, when we take an English or composition class we are tested on elements of writing, why not bring that weigh and measure philosophy into the workplace so we can quantify the value of professional writing?


  3. Gerry

    One aspect of measuring quality of communications products is to look for a sustainable, quality and repeatable process. There can be no short cuts.

    For a lengthy description of this there is no better book than “Information Development” by JoAnn Hackos.


  4. Great piece Gerry. Would you consider giving some suggested readings / resources on good writing formulas? As one of the “Managers” you mention above, it would be useful to have this as a reference when working with writers. All the best!


  5. Yes, yes, yes! I totally agree. In business, there must be formulas for writing content. In personal life, you DO have the human right to write whatever you want. Business is different.


  6. Very perceptive article. At my company, where you use the terms “formula” and “formulaic” (pejorative to some people) we substitute “structure” and “structured” to describe our content development.


  7. Yes, where can we find this formula! :)


  8. Gerry, your article sparked a few ideas for me and I think to sway people you could say that there is a democratic way to seek order and hierarchy for a website.

    It’s your care words. Democracy is all about the majority rules and that’s what your care words are, organizing a site according to the long neck, or the things that the majority of people want to find.


  9. While thought-provoking, I’m not sure I completely agree with this piece. In any case:

    1. What does measurability means in the context of copywriting? That there is some kind of systematic process to it, and that this process can be measured in some way? Or that good content has to deliver measurable value at search time (findability) or read time (task success)? Seems to me that measuring these goals require different–and potentially antagonistic–criterias and metrics.

    2. Why the use of the word “formula” instead of “guideline”? A formula is deterministic, like a recipe. It implies that there is one precise, optimal way of communicating something in a given context. But is there? Obviously not in every context…


  10. No argument, but I’m missing what’s new here. Structured writing is as old as Information Mapping (decades old) and is still leading the pack with DITA. Maybe the content writers in these examples don’t come from a professional writing discipline such as techncial communication. Many writers in that field have a Masters in Science degree guiding them. (My own MS is 14 years old.)


  11. Gerry, I totally agree with you, but I wonder - how would you measure the impact of content? How would you quantify it? It has to be a more meaningful measure than page views.


  12. Writing in most instances is a craft and not an art. And a master crafts person can make a huge difference to the effectiveness and ROI of your site. We revere the chef who produces the same quality dish time after time - so why not the writer?

    The power of words can be measured in terms of resulting actions. If a reader is moved to follow an instruction, buy a product or sign up for a service in part the writer is responsible. Putting a firm metric, that managers will understand, next to this is however more problematic.


  13. Ah, wouldn’t it be great to have the formula!

    Over the last couple of years, I’ve been testing a range of headings and summaries, covering a range of areas (iTunes launch, petfood scare, Microsoft cheap software initiative, final Harry Potter book). In every instance, a couple of headings/summaries have outshone everything else. And there are similarities between these headings/summaries. I’m just compiling the results and will publish them soon.

    On a larger point, the formula is to let the customer decide. The Web lets us test content in a way that was not really possible before.


  14. Great post. I take the stand that the ability to develop quality content is the most critical marketing capability a B2B company needs to master. I look forward to seeing the results of your studies.


  15. Great idea. “A production line can be set up where this content can be mass produced, tested, and measured.” Where do I learn to do this? What book or course will impart these skills to me?


  16. Corl, I don’t like to be pushy about my own latest book, but Killer Web Content has some good ideas in it. You can find out more about it here, and read the first chapter free:
    http://www.gerrymcgovern.com/killer-web-content.htm


  17. Hi Gerry, Killer Web Content is the most useful and concise books on web writing I’ve read in a long time. I’m already on page 156, marking and notating it furiously.

    With this post I was just wondering if you were referring to more writing processes I needed to know about.


  18. Corl,
    Thanks very much for your kind words. I’m delighted that you’ve found the book so useful. The basic principles that I address in Killer Web Content are the same as the ones I’m talking about in this article.

    Could I ask you a favor. If you get a moment, could you write a short review at Amazon:
    http://tinyurl.com/3×7hwv

    Thanks

    Gerry


  19. I think that telling and illustrating to managers that a process is being followed helps. Even sales has a process whether it’s for making appointments or closing the deal. Writing content is no different.


  20. Great advise there Gerry - You need to present content as a science, not an art is a powerful statement and so true.


  21. This was such an insightful article that I am going to go and buy your book.

    It pretty much turned on a light bulb in my head allowing me to approach my new business in a different way. Thank you. :)

Leave a Reply