Intranets: getting senior management’s attention
By Gerry McGovern
If the intranet is to show genuine value to the organization, it must prove that it is increasing productivity and reducing costs.
Intranets are still struggling. Senior management does not see them as being business critical. If the intranet is to get respect and proper funding, it must prove that it is improving productivity and efficiency.
The one thing that the intranet can truly deliver is time. It can make it quicker for staff to carry out basic tasks such as finding product information; finding experts; locating forms and processes.
In 10 years working on intranets, I have rarely found a senior manager who had anything but a passing interest in one. Why is that? Is the intranet really so trivial, so unimportant that senior management simply doesn’t have time to get involved?
“Even though most of the organizations we analyzed have a developing intranet or portal supporting key business processes, we found that in most organizations there is often a lack of understanding about the strategic importance of the organization’s intranet,” writes Helen Day of Intranet Benchmarking Forum (IBF).
IBF has carried out a survey of 70 large organizations, as well as analyzing the benchmarking data of all its global members. Their conclusion: “Senior leaders struggle to see why they should be involved with intranet development, and this leads to little or no obvious senior level support.”
This view is echoed by intranet expert, Jane McConnell. “The major perception of intranets is that they are information tools, only somewhat a collaboration tool and practically not at all a tool that brings business value to the organization.”
The intranet has huge potential, but it is not being sold properly to senior management, and if senior management doesn’t engage, then the intranet is going nowhere.
Don’t talk to senior managers about IT projects. An IT project involves buying and installing some big software system, then leaving it to do its job. That’s not how quality intranets work. They require constant care and attention.
Senior management doesn’t have much respect for communications, so if the intranet is seen as being run by communications, then its role is diminished.
An intranet that is associated with data management will get little respect. At best, this is like having a giant rough-and-ready library where stuff gets stored. That’s not business critical.
Your intranet can be a goldmine, so don’t sell it like a coalmine. The gold-dust of the intranet is productivity. A great intranet will save time whenever a staff member carries out a common task. These time savings will lead to greater operational efficiency and a more competitive organization.
It’s hard to sell intranet time to senior management because intranet time is five minutes saved here, two minutes saved there. But persevere, because time is the essence of the organization.
The less time an engineer spends finding a colleague and locating an engine diagram, the more time they can spend developing that new product. The less time a sales representative spends filling out an expense form and booking travel, the more time they can spend making the sale.
If you can prove that your intranet saves time, sooner or later you will get attention, respect and funding from senior management.

Gail says:
Added on August 27th, 2007 at 12:55 pmWe have tried repeatedly to sell a new sales portal based on time productivity but our executives tell us we cannot prove that sales will use the time savings to sell more product. Sure, the extranet saves time but how do you prove *what* that time savings will be used for? No one is willing to put their neck on the line and say “xx time savings based on improved intranet will be used to sell xx more product and therefore bring in xx more revenue.”
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on August 28th, 2007 at 8:02 amGail,
You raise a key point here. The argument I use is this: Let’s say you can prove that you can save 15 minutes every day for a sales rep. Well, you can’t prove that this saved 15 minutes is spent selling. But what you can prove is that right now it is being wasted. You are giving back 15 minutes to management. You are adding 15 minutes back into the productivity pool. It is then up to management to use it wisely, but right now it is definitely lost.
Gerry
Paul says:
Added on August 28th, 2007 at 9:31 am“If you can prove that your intranet saves time” - that seems to me to be the difficult part before you even get to the challenge of convincing senior management that time saved is going to be used to do something valuable. Isn’t it really hard to establish exactly how much time is going to be saved by putting a process onto the intranet? Do you have any thoughts on how - in very general terms - an organisation might go about doing this?
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on August 28th, 2007 at 10:13 amPaul,
Over the years, I’ve read a lot about Frederick Taylor, who many regard as the father of modern management. Taylor had the very same problem you describe: how to show that a particular way of doing something saves more time than another way.
Well, the way Taylor solved it is the same way that I think we solve it on the intranet today. He did time and motion studies. Basically, he created an average measure of how long it took a typical worker to complete a defined task using process A, then measured how long it took using process B.
This is not easy stuff and it took Taylor 20 years before his ideas were truly accepted.