Why simplicity is essential to web design
A simple website charges you less time. A complex website charges you more time. Time is your most precious resource.
Simplicity is highly overrated, according to Donald Norman, a design thinker I very much admire. “I’m a champion of elegance, simplicity, and ease of use,” Norman writes. “But, as a business person, I also know that companies have to make money, which means they have to deliver the products that their customers want, not the products they believe they should want. And the truth is, simplicity does not sell.”
So why do we buy complexity even when the simple option would be better? Three reasons. Firstly, because we do judge a book by its cover; we do think beauty is skin deep. If something looks complicated, then we immediately assume that it must be powerful; must have greater value.
Secondly, we love to show off. Complexity is like the peacock’s feathers. It is brash and impossible to miss. Complexity lets other people know how clever we are and how rich, because we can afford such complexity.
Thirdly, buying complexity is like buying insurance. We might not need all these fancy features right now, but there might be some time in the future when we will. Buying complexity insures us against future need.
“When users choose a feature-laden product, they may not be exhibiting a desire for complexity,” Joshua Porter writes in his very interesting article, Simplicity: The Ultimate Sophistication. “Instead, users are anxious about predicting their future needs.”
None of the above conditions operate on a website for the following reasons. First, we don’t pay for visiting a website with our money; we pay for it with our time. The longer we spend on a website the more we pay, so there is a strong motivation to spend as little time as possible.
Second, websites are about the present, not the future. Investing in a product is about predicting all the future uses we may have for it. Visiting a website is about now. We have a particular need and we visit the website to meet that particular need.
Website behavior is not about insuring against future conditions but rather about reaping the benefits of past actions. In other words, we like websites that resemble websites we’re used to visiting, because they are more familiar and easier to navigate.
Third, we can’t wear a website, drive around in it or show it off at a party. Browsing a website is essentially private behavior. When we go to Google we are usually alone. We search for cheap flights, but we certainly don’t go around advertising that we’re cheap.
If people loved complexity on the Web, then everyone would be using Advanced Search. We’d all be going to the 10th page of search results instead of clicking on one of the first three results on the first page.
We may still end up buying complex products on the Web, but our web behavior will remain relentlessly simple and hugely impatient. We use the Web during the ad breaks for Desperate Housewives. We simply don’t have time to waste on complex navigation, convoluted language, or the vanity publishing of navel-gazing organizations.

Reema Sarin says:
Added on April 15th, 2007 at 5:32 pmExcellent Article with very authentic points highlighted with the perfect ‘Simplicity’
Peter Cullen says:
Added on April 16th, 2007 at 8:41 amI wonder Gerry if there is a fine line, even on the web, between a simple to use site and a good looking site? As much as people want to find what they are looking for, if your website does not look professional, will people be worried about the simplicity? Especially on e-commerce sites.
Just wondering if you have found if the quality of the site design (in terms of look) has much impact on ‘conversion’. Or is it all about simple navigation?
Joe Szabo says:
Added on April 16th, 2007 at 1:22 pmexcellent insight! I will save this email for a long time and use it always when reference is needs. thank you so much for making it so clear.
jim mollica says:
Added on April 17th, 2007 at 4:59 pmWell put. Classic form & function argument. Or should I say, function & form. This could go back and forth. I side with you that usability should hold more weight than appearance and interaction.
It is critical for an organization to pay close attention to site travel: entrance points, pageview & durations, exits points and the list goes on. I have produced sites that have thousands of visitors per day. I have learned through experience that complex navigation contains a lessor amount of pageviews and quicker exit rates. If navigation systems are complex and the content is overwhelming, people simply do not waste their time or they have a very specific purpose for visiting. Their actions speak volumes. It would be interesting to see a corporate site attempt to deliver information and capture their audience with a flash driven navigation system that transitions and repositions itself on every section. People don’t waste time playing peek-a-boo when they are researching and performing tasks.
Thank you for your article.
Gerry McGovern (blog author) says:
Added on April 17th, 2007 at 10:01 pmPeter, you raise an issue that I haven’t really found the right answer for. People are definitely impacted by visuals. But a strong visual impact has not stopped sites like MySpace and YouTube being successful. And Amazon doesn’t exactly look pretty. I’d love to see some really good research here.
Jim, I couldn’t agree more with you. I think this is a very important sentence you write:
“I have learned through experience that complex navigation contains a lessor amount of pageviews and quicker exit rates. ”
I have found the very same thing.
Charlie Melichar says:
Added on April 24th, 2007 at 5:18 pmGerry -
One other thought on complexity. Sometimes it is a product of lack of focus, or organizational buy-in. I know this happens in higher education and I would bet this is not the only “sector” that falls victim to the problem.
Effective design is as much about what doesn’t go on the homepage/site as what does. When there isn’t appropriate check off on what the key messages and drivers are, you get cluttered, complex design that doesn’t do a whole heck of a lot to give those navigating the site to work with.
Charlie